Tuesday, October 14, 2014


October 14, 2014


Dear Mr Vishal Bhardwaj,


In the context of your recently released film #Haider I not only as a Kashmiri Pandit but as a Kashmiri have few concerns with regard to its adaptation from Hamlet & script written by Basharat Peer - ( a Kashmiri Muslim himself )

Martand Sun Temple Kashmir 
First as a Kashmiri Pandit & as a Hindu Brahman I felt offended to have seen a song picturised on the lawns of Historical & ancient Martand Sun Temple  (the hindu Sun God) that could have easily been shot elsewhere and the script did not necessarily demand such a background. Having done so, you added injury to the insult by symbolising the background of the song as den of an emerging devil (Khurram obviously, in your film) from the "garbha graha" the sanctum sanctorumThe huge puppet appears to be an inspiration spilled from the Bhaand Pathar  ( an ethnic drama society of Kashmir - the Bhaands ). The Foreign Press Reporter speaks of the act being performed by the Bhaands for a peaceful Kashmir. However, the adopted devil character from the Bhaand Pathar apparently represents the devilish side of #Haider's mother and uncle Khurram. 

Another thought that just came to my mind about possibility of your showcasing the Martand Sun Temple could be to appease those who hate worshipers of Sun God, apart from Hindus,  for instance the #Yazdis who are being butchered and slaughtered by #ISIS, in the backdrop of Kashmiri Sunni Separatist's leaning towards the Islamic State ideology ? Just a thought - could be a coincidence. 

The song follows a scene where Khurram is seeking permission of elders to marry his widowed Sister-in-law ( Tabbu ) that is granted & cut to "Nikah" where both say yes to the knot & #Haider being the central character of the film, is unwantedly pushed into dance sequence in the next scene partly as a celebration of the marriage and partly to vent out his frustration .  Well, I won't be bothered much about your production part and its values thereof but I want to make a point that cut to the scene of this song at Martand Sun Temple lawns was absolutely uncalled for and not at all necessary to be shot there.  I would love to see how many of the Hollywood or Bollywood Directors would differ that the song warranted such a locale and could not have been picturised elsewhere.  Why not at Hazratbal Dargah premises instead that had much better scenic background with mountains and Chinar Trees and lake etc.in the background.  This would have made it more subtle in the context of Kashmir.  Nevertheless you chose otherwise. 

Hazratbal Shrine
As a Kashmiri Pandit, my genuine grievance remains that despite the fact that more than 3,00,000 Kashmiri Pandits were forced to leave their homes empty handed & continue to live like refugees in their own country, you as well as Basharat Peer found it convenient to ignore. Forget about Kashmiri Pandit or Kashmiri Brahman or Kashmiri Hindu, what about 3 lakh humans who are refugees in their own country for 25 years now ? Did your conscious not prick you even once ? They have been a micro minority of the Valley without any minority benefits or privileges compared to their peers elsewhere in the Country who expect all the benefits and privileges as a Minority. How were Kashmiri Pandits not so important in the context of your film #Haider ? As long as your film remains in the public domain, these questions will continue to remain and haunt you as a human being. Kashmiri Pandit community too have gone through the violence against them - the #Genocide, brutal killings, murders and rapes of their women, how are they born of a lesser God ? Why does world look the other way, including the people like you, when it comes to their ongoing plight? You definitely need to introspect. 

My another concern is about the UA Certificate granted to the film with parental discretion by the Censor Board.  I understand the film has been granted this certificate after about 41 cuts. To what extent has the film been able to retain the expression and message that you intended to give, after 41 cuts, is a matter of concern. I have no idea of the scenes that have been censored.  You might have tried to balance the film but you have almost portrayed the Indian Army as Villains. The focus is more on local police rather than paramilitary or military forces that remained engaged in anti-terrorism operations in the Valley.   Because of these reasons, I had to file two RTI applications against the Censor Board of Film Certification through the Ministry of Information & Broadcasting. It has directed the Censor Board on 8th of October, 2014 to provide me the details of these cuts as also the Minutes of the Board meeting relevant to the certification of #Haider.  There has been a media report wherein one member of the Censor Board, Nandini Sardesai has alleged that the suspended CEO of CBFC Rakesh Kumar allegedly arrested for bribery, did not refer #Haider to the Review Committee and issued the Certificate to it after its two exclusive screening with him.   The timing of the issuance of the UA Certificate to #Haider and CEO's arrest raises several questions in the mind of the people who have every right to know the facts. 

Lastly, I am sure research team of #Haider have done lot of hard work but have failed on several counts.  Few important of them are -
  • For instance, Haider when gets down the bus for security check, he says he is going to Srinagar & when asked where does he live he says Islamabad (in fact Anantnag ). What made him to say Srinagar & not so called "Islamabad"  in the first place ? Subsequently Arshi (Shraddha Kapoor ) explains to the Army Officer that Anantnag is also referred as Islamabad. It looks this controversial name of the town has been included in the script intentionally although the script did not warrant it. The place of #Haider's residence could have been mentioned as Srinagar that he mentioned in the first place, where he was going. 
  • Arshi (Shraddha Kapoor), the Heroin of the film and a Journalist sarcastically calls an Army Officer a "Masala Dosa" just because he is a South Indian ? Doesn't it construe to "Racism" and disrespect for other culture, ethnicity or a religion ? Have you not insulted & hurt the sentiments of millions of South Indian soldiers of the Indian Army & billions of other south indians ? 
Sindh (Pakistan ) Skull Cap of KK Menon
Skull cap used by KK Menon (Khurram) & few other characters in the film is not part of the ethnic wear of the Muslim community of Jammu & Kashmir.  Such skull caps in the Muslim community are worn in Sindh province of #Pakistan definitely not in Kashmir. 
Tabbu referred as Mojee ( mother ) is fine but when Khurram is referring her to #Haider ( during his hysterical speech at Lal Chowk ), he should have said Moj NOT Mojee. Mojee is when it is one to one or when you are calling mother. If you have been so passionate about distorting the expression of english accent by Kashmiris, you should have equally been as passionate to work on these finer details as well. 

  • Local accent of English language is unwarranted and adds not much of value to the film. It appears symbolic, quite artificial & deliberate. Reflects very poorly about the Kashmiris as a whole.  Unfortunately, you do not seem to have come across Kashmiris who speak english with much better accent than anyone else.  Does Basharat Peer, the script writer of the film also have that local accent ? I don't think so.
Orange TT ball did not exist in 1995
  • Football has always been the popular game in the valley that could have been more relevant than showing a Table Tennis Game that too flawed with a orange ball. During the picturised period of #Haider being 1995, white Table Tennis ball was more relevant because orange balls came into being much later in the game. 
  • Wahhabi Islamic code was enforced in Kashmir around the period of your film wherein cinema halls and video parlours were shut down, beauty parlours were closed, and consumption of alcohol was strictly forbidden.  Wonder how did this Video Parlour existed & formed an important part of your film. The two important characters therein making fun of Yiddish word #Chutzpah with a foreigner tourist couple (Pronouncing it as चुज़पह contrary to हज़पाः that it shold have been in the context of AFSPA as a satire ?
  • Lalit Parimoo ( a Kashmiri Pandit himself ) as Parvez Lone, introduces himself as SP Downtown (Jammu & Kashmir Police - JKP ) wearing a police uniform of an Inspector with three stars. 

SP in Inspector's uniform ?
How can a Director of your repute do such a blunder ? Superintendent of Police would have one Ashoka Emblem & a Star not three stars on his uniform. Lalit himself would have been familiar that and this much would be expected of an old actor like him, being the minimum. 

Indian Army didn't have a RPG-7 in its inventory and the RL-84 Rocket launchers that it used, never set buildings to fire.They just drilled holes through the walls. The soldiers move around with INSAS rifles in the film set in 1995 when these weapons were introduced only in 1997. The vehicles used by the Indian Army in 1995 were not the ones soldiers use in the movie. Source )

Stars on the Collar Dogs came in 2000 
  • The stars on the collar dogs for Brigadiers and above were introduced in 2000s and a Brigadier (portrayed by Ashish Vidyarthi in the film) couldn't have worn them in 1995.

Basharat Peer ( the Script writer )
The script writer Basharat Peer couldn't hold back his temptation of a brief & passing appearance in the film (with no dialogues ? ) a person in the film not getting inside his home - shown as being habituated of frisking. Could he not hold back his urge though it is not a disqualification for the film? But why the temptation and urge at all ? Playing victim ?

  • In the climax of your film before Mojee blasts herself with the Grenades tied on her, she looks lustful even towards her son #Haider  and goes on to kiss him on his lips ? What made you think Kashmiris (Muslims or Hindus) are loose charactered that a mother could be portrayed in such a humiliating manner and this scene can not be watched by a son and a mother sitting together ? If the scene is scripted by Basharat Peer & not direct adoption from Hamlet, he should hang his head in shame for embarrassing Kashmiri mothers & showcasing them as Sluts

I hope you or someone from your core team gets to see my open letter to you and explains your position vis-a-vis the points raised about the #Haider as above.  

Moral of the story - 

"you can fool some people sometimes but not all the people all the times"

Thank you  &  with regards 

Rajender Khushu 
New Delhi (India)











12 comments:

  1. Your article is eye opener. You have valid points.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks. Allahabad High Court yesterday held the same opinion and issued notices to all of them including CBFC.

      Delete
  2. Why people fail to understand that its not Vishal Bhardwaj's "Duty" to tell your story (Kashmiri Pandit). Its his movie , he picks up a story which he wants to tell and not what you want to hear.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Vishal Bhardwaj may not have this duty but he has moral responsibility of not taking a subject in the disguise of Hamlet that is anti-national & demeaning of another religious belief. I don't care what he makes as a film director but no one including him has any right to distort the facts and mislead the audience. If what you say was right, the two bench Allahabad High Court would not have taken cognizance of the PIL filed against him and Censor Board & granted him just four weeks time to respond.

      Apart form this, let me enlighten you about RTI Act 2005 that is applicable to the Censor Board of Film Certification. If you want to overlook that Rakesh Kumar, suspended CEO of CBFC was allegedly arrested for bribery and #Haider was the last film that he cleared, its purely your prerogative. Interestingly, Nandini Sardesai - one of the Censor Board Members has alleged that Rakesh Kumar cleared this film of his own without referring it to the Review Committee.

      I hope this answers several of your questions that you might still have in our mind.

      Delete
  3. To, Dear Rajender Khushu. The content of ur writing is indeed quite intriguing and thought provoking but i would like to share that one can't cover multiple subjects in a single movie. The plot of Haider was was totally different and had nothing to do with Kashmiri Pandits. Moreover its not necessary to show the plight of kashmiri Pandits in every movie coming up. Instead I wud like to ask, why can't we make up documentaries or movies which shows; How kashmiri pandits have evolved in such short span of time after such a huge devastation. And I dont have much to say about the picturization of song in Sun temple.. because for audience sun temple is as good as hazratbal shrine. By commenting on it we can only incite polarisation and nothing else.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I do agree with you but not completely. The subject Vishal Bhardwaj chose was insurgency in Kashmir post 1990 and focussed more around 1995 in the disguise of Hamlet. I could not make out the relevance of Hamlet in this film when it was more around Shahid Kapoor ( #Haider ) and #Kashmir insurgency the theme.

    Basharat Peer has anyways been leaning towards the Kashmiri Separatists and choosing him as co Script writer of the film was quite obvious that vindicates my apprehensions. Having said so, exile of Kashmiri Pandits in 1990 did not get any attention nationally or internationally purely because there was hardly any digital news media around at that time. By the time it became a reality, #Genocide and exodus of Kashmiri pandits was a history and a forgotten story. That doesn't cease it of the fact that #Genocide of Kashmiri Hindus and their exodus was worth ignoring and highlighting alleged excess shown to have been committed by the Indian Army, in the film. Vishal Bhardwaj did realise exodus of KPs was relevant and important and made a passing remark through the Brigadier ( Ashish Vidyarthi ) purely to escape the expected criticism about this reality that would remain etched always in the history of Kashmir and India.

    It's not that KPs subject has not been highlighted through the Documentaries or films. There have been attempts. Ashoke Pandit did that long back and it is available even today on the #Youtube. #Sheen has been another commercial film of Ashoke Pandit about KPs.

    I don't intend to polarise by my observations but suppression of Hindus and appeasement of #Muslims is something that is quite disturbing. Even Kashmiri Pandits have been a micro minority of a muslim majority state of J&K, what privileges or benefits were ever extended to them. They expect all kinds of benefits and privileges elsewhere they are a minority but deny it when it comes to giving ? That's hypocritical.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Why do you think mother can't kiss her child on lips.... Why do you have to be so narrow in thinking.... It's mere expression of love and not lust at all
    Broaden up your horizon dude

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you have not known the Kashmiri culture, you shouldn't make a sweeping comment. Kashmiri mothers do not behave like sluts. I hope you get my point. No Kashmiri mother would kiss his grown up adult son on his lips ( child yes, any mother would do that ) , may be your mother does to your adult grown up brother and it doesn't matter to her. It's perhaps in Russian culture where mothers do sleep with their sons and vice-versa but not in India & Kashmir in particular. Better educate yourself and mind you I am not a dude but dad of dudes. You will take years to reach my horizon, therefore chill and wait for your son to grow up so that you get a chance to smooch him. Unworthy comment.

      Delete
  6. Your side of story might be valid but you have to think first. In many movies, gujaratis and punjabis have been made fun of that doesn't mean entire Gujarat and Punjab is filled with such people. You are really sick minded person who cant take a single negative comment on himself. The way you replied to the woman above shows what kind of culture you belong to; who not only insulted a woman and her mother but also Russians who have no concerns with your stupid ideology. You are really sick and illiterate and a complete racist, people like you have filled all kind of hatred in India, just enjoy 3 hour movie and chill, no need to create such big drama.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. are you a bunch of hired jokers of Vishal Bhardwaj ? to me it really looks so. You don't even know that we are not just talking of desecration of Martand Sun Temple but Patriotism as well. Who gave him the licence to demean Indian Army and portray them as Villains ? As far as art is concerned, you surely have no idea. Your ears may be used to cacophony of three hours of shit that arouses you and entertaining taste buds. Your name suggests you are a #Christian and you guys are at least good at speaking and understanding english language quite well but you seem to be disappointing me on that account also as you do not know what does "alleged" means when I refer a sentence in the context of Russians. As far as this lady is concerned, she herself has considered it normal to kiss a grown up brother or son... you shouldn't be worried about her. If it does, then she is in agreement with me that Vishal Bhardwaj did portray a Kashmiri woman like a slut. I doubt you might be even 25 years yet that reflects in your comments and your obsession about the crap like #haider. My community has been at receiving end, living like refugees in our own country for 25 years. Do you even have a slightest of idea what does it mean when you lose your home ? Do you call it a drama.... you should hang your head in shame for making such a nonsense comment for a movie that is anti-national, anti-indian army, anti-community specific, even having miserably failed on several aspects of filmmaking. I am surprised that anti-nationals like you jump to defend that is indefensible. By the way I have already had his noose tightened with my RTIs against Censor Board, CBI and Allahabad High Court. So take a can of coke, it will chill you.... good bye

      Delete
  7. Dear Sir. I just wanted to let you know that am a kashmiri pandit too and was a part of exodus due to militancy and am not at all offended by the movie. Having said that I absolutely disagree with all your points. This is an artistic expression and I feel we should look at it from that prism. And not connect it with our issues in such a melodramatic way. You are however free to choose any which way you want to respond to the movie.

    Ps: if you happen to watch prince hamlet Hollywood version of the adaptation you will see the same kissing scene of which you've made such a big deal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anant, It's your opinion and you have every right to have it. That doesn't take away my right to voice my opinion just because you have been the part of the KP exodus and I have not been. I am afraid I have no idea what knowledge you have about art, theatre or artistic expression. I come from a theatrical & television background and I know the basics being the minimum that Vishal Bhardwaj has not even bothered to consider knowing well that there is no dearth of dumb people to watch his crap. let me also make it clear that it's not melodramatic but about ignoring something that will go in the history as a piece of distorted artistic expression. It has to be rebutted.

      As far as adaptation of Hamlet is concerned, Basharat Peer can not ever think of getting even near to Hamlet forget about a screen play. His maturity as a writer is quite seen by his lure for a frame in the film for himself.

      Lastly, the matter is sub-judice with CBI on a complaint filed by me with the CBFC through an RTI and I would wish to rest my further comments hereon. Thanks for your comments - its your view and I have my view. It has nothing to do with the exodus of my community that gives you more right to defend your point of view. For your information, I have not been the victim of the Exodus as I left the valley much before but I still am passionately connected to it. I can not let people like Vishal Bhardwaj distort the facts that are written and re-written time and again for the last 25 years.

      Delete